Meh-ga Nuke

Motivation

Years ago, Bdale flew some Woot screaming flying monkey dolls in his L3 certification airframe, leading to some seriously amusing videos.

Unfortunately, that airframe was one of many lost in the Black Forest Fire.

At a conference late in 2014, one of the founders of Woot approached Bdale to talk about the possibility of another sponsored rocket project for his new venture, Mediocre Laboratories and its flagship site meh.

Bdale had already started thinking about building another "big-ass rocket" ...

After giving it some serious thought, the goal became building something bigger than anything Bdale had built and flown before, but that would fit in with the "mediocre" theme somehow. Most rocket folks start out flying "three fins and a nose cone", so doing a simple rocket of that style seemed like a good starting point. The coolest such rocket clan Garbee has ever built was undoubtedly Robert's first high-power airframe, a LOC Precision Lil' Nuke kit.

So .. how about a stupidly-large upscale of the LOC Lil' Nuke! Bdale's wife Karen suggested the name, since this is definitely a meh-ga nuke!

Design Details

After a bunch of playing around in OpenRocket, and considering the limits of the CNC equipment at hand, an airframe diameter of approximately 12 inches was chosen. We can fly high on 6-inch research motors (first flight was on a James Russell research red-flame "O" motor), and fly low and super crowd-pleasing on fast-burning M motors like the CTI Pro98 M3400WT in a suitable adapter.

To achieve sufficient stability on an O motor, the nose needs to be pretty heavy. Simulation suggested that turning the nose out of solid pine would work out just about perfectly. And thanks to the fire, Bdale had some large pine logs drying... but trying to turn a nose cone out of one of those was kind of a disaster! So we ended up asking Dan at Python Rocketry for help, and he delivered an outstanding bespoke nose cone for the project!

Because such a heavy nose cone would put significant compression load on the rest of the airframe, we took notes from Kevin Trojanowski's large rocket group projects, and decided to build internal structure to carry that load rather than depending on the airframe material itself. Some quick back of the envelope calculations suggest that 3 ribs made of cheap, common 1x2 pine lumber would more than suffice.

For the airframe, we acquired a length of 12-inch concrete column form, peeling the inner and outer layers to get rid of the waxy surfaces. The tubes were then wrapped with two layers of 6oz fiberglass using West Systems epoxy and peel-ply fabric to consolidate the fibers and make for a reasonably smooth finish with minimal sanding. A section of airframe tubing was slit and closed down to form a coupler at the front of the fin can, so the main airframe can be separated to ease transportation and flight prep.

The fins were fabricated from nominal 1/2 inch birch plywood with rounded edges. They were inserted into fin grooves cut in the forward and aft centering rings and interlocked with two intermediate rings for mechanical strength. All rings were CNC cut from 3/4 inch birch plywood, except the aft ring which was doubled by laminating two pieces of plywood to form a 1.5-inch-thick aft ring more likely to survive the kinetic energy of landing. The epoxy used for all fin to ring joints (and most others in the airframe) was augmented with West Systems 403 Microfibers, yielding very strong yet light joints. Once the fin can was fully assembled, the fins were laminated with with one partial layer of 5.7oz 2x2 twill carbon fiber for stiffness, and one layer of tip to tip 6oz fiberglass for surface preservation and strength.

Charge cups for primary and secondary black powder charges mount on the top of the fin can forward ring where they are easy to load before adding the main airframe tube to the stack. This ring also sports an ARRD intended to release the main chute during descent. The main airframe tube has 3 ribs epoxied to the inside of the skin that sit on the fin can forward ring after assembly, and provide a bearing surface for the nose cone once it is installed. In this way, the compressive load from the nose mass carries down through the ribs into the fin can plywood stack, and no significant load is carried by the aiframe tubing itself. The main airframe also has a "baffle" between two of the ribs that causes the gas produced by the black powder charges to flow up past the main parachute to blow off the nose cone.

Because the nose ended up being really heavy after adding sufficient nose weight to stabilize the airframe on big motors, recovery starts by blowing off the nose at apogee and deploying 2 mil-surplus 5-foot parachutes on a "V" harness. The main chute is a 28-foot man-rated mil-surplus chute in a Giant Leap deployment bag, and the harness is fabricated from lots of REI 1-inch climbing strap (in bright purple, of course!) and a number of different size stainless steel quick-links.

A side-access electronics bay in the valley between two fins provides space for two removeable "sleds", each holding an Altus Metrum TeleMega. Each TeleMega has a single dedicated 850mAh LiPo battery, and a rotary power switch mounted in the airframe for on/off. Custom dipole antennas were designed and integrated into the construction just inside the airframe skin to maximize telemetry performance, with RG-188 teflon coax and SMA connectors to the flight computers.

The airframe is configured with two 1515-sized rail buttons, and is really only considered safe to launch from Terry Lee's launch trailer with 20 feet of very stiff 1515 rail.

Revisions for Version 2

Because the main airframe zippered somewhat on the first flight, and the ARRD released at apogee, rather than just repairing the existing airframe tube, I designed and built a complete replacement.

To increase stability, the main airframe tube length was extended from the original 4.5 feet to approximately 6 feet. This increased stability allowing a reduction in nose weight, increasing safety. It means the length is more than a strict scaling of the Lil Nuke, but is less than the Nuke Pro Maxx.

For main deployment, the ARRD was replaced with a Tender Descender L3, which has the advantage that the release mechanism is orthogonal to the axis of flight. That seems important when the airframe is this heavy and apogee occurs at a non-nominal velocity, as in the first flight.

The original build had internal 1x2 ribs and a baffle yielding a "D" shaped main bay with the apogee charge gasses going up the channel without pushing on the main deployment bag. For this rebuild, 3 ribs were run the airframe length between the 12" airframe and a concentric full-length 8" deployment bay, with centering rings on each end. One sector of the rings was vented to allow apogee ejection gasses to flow from the charge cups on the leading edge of the fin can to the nose, bypassing the main chute bay.

Design / Simulation File

Construction Log

2014.04.16 Purchased 12 feet of 12 inch concrete casting tube from White Cap, they cut it for me into pieces approximately 8.5 and 3.5 feet long.

2014.04.18 Peeled the tubes inside and out, resulting cardboard measures 12" ID, and 12.25" OD. Cut two centering rings from scrap 1/2" OSB to allow use of on-hand 3/4" copper water pipe as an axle during glassing operations. I ended up cutting the longer piece of airframe tubing to ease the glassing process, such that I can "wrap normally".

2014.04.19 Realized I only have enough glass to do one layer on the coupler. Placed order for a full roll of 60" width 6oz E-glass. Used West Systems 105 resin and 209 extra-slow hardener mixed in 3-pump batches to bond one layer of glass and peel-ply to the coupler tube. Took either 15 or 18 pumps total, the cardboard tube is much "thirstier" than the PML phenolic tubing I've glassed for previous projects. Given how much cheaper the concrete casting tube is, this is fine, I'll just need to pay attention to my epoxy stock and order more if needed!

2014.04.20 Peeled the peel-ply on the coupler. Looks adequate for use as a coupler, but there are several spots where more epoxy would have made me happier. Will compensate when wrapping the airframe tubes. Given how "thirsty" the cardboard is, I think the trick will just be to paint the tube with a thick layer of epoxy before starting to apply the glass, then be generous when wetting each layer.

At this point, a lot of time passed, detailed note-taking more or less stopped, and the airframe wasn't completed until early 2018!

Photos

All the photos and video I've collected associated with this project can be found here.

Kent Burnett's drone video hightlights reel from Airfest 2018 includes video of the launch starting at about 10:36 in.

Flight Log

First Flight

The first flight of this airframe was at the Kloudbusters Airfest 24 in Argonia, Kansas, USA, on Saturday, 1 September 2018. The motor was a 6-inch "O" built by James Russell using his well-known "Russell Red" formula. The total launch mass was about 205 pounds on the rail. Due to a slightly larger than optimal nozzle throat, the motor burn at 7.7 seconds was a bit longer than expected, pushing the airframe with an average acceleration of only 2.89 G to a maximum speed of Mach 0.6 on the way to 8068 feet above ground.

Weather-cocking due to wind caused the airframe to have a residual speed at apogee of nearly 60 meters per second, so not surprisingly there was zippering of the top of the main airframe tube. It also seems clear that the ARRD failed to retain the deployment bag, as the main chute deployed a few seconds after apogee. We had some difficulty with the ARRD during assembly on the rail, so this wasn't terribly surprising. Recovery was completely safe with the nose descending under 2 5-foot mil-surplus chutes, and the bulk of the airframe descending under a 28-foot mil-surplus chute.

The stress at deployment tore the strap off the deployment bag, and the deployment bag was not recovered. After studying the zipper and thinking about the main deployment sequence, several changes will be made before the next flight:

  • The main airframe tube will be replaced with a tube that's a bit longer (for greater stability), and has an internal 7.5-8" diameter tube instead of the flat baffle to ease main chute deployment.

  • Switch from the ARRD to the largest Tender Descender for main deployment.

  • Add a TeleGPS to the nose assembly so it can be tracked independently, and let it come down by itself under the 2 existing 5-foot chutes. Add a third 5-foot chute to be a dedicated pilot for the 28-foot main chute.

These changes should reduce the chance of another zipper, and reduce the amount of strap we need to stuff into the bay.

All in all, this first flight was an outstanding group effort, a lovely flight, and a huge crowd-pleaser!

Second Flight

In 2021, the NAR National Sport Launch was held near Alamosa, CO. Doug Gerrard planned to be there with his camera-laden launch pad so there was the possibility of a highly-documented launch. Since I really wanted to fly this project in Colorado and that was a national-scale event, plans were made. As a NAR sanctioned event, the motor needed to be commercial and not research. Simulations led to the choice of a CTI N3301 White Thunder which would fit case hardware already on hand. This would require fabricating an adapter from the 6" motor mount to the 98mm motor, but that seemed easy enough. My thanks to the good folks at Moto-Joe Rocketry for helping me obtain the reload.

Unfortunately, logistics issues prevented flying at the NSL. The second flight ended up happening on Sunday, 19 September 2021, at the Tripoli Colorado Fall Frenzy launch.

In addition to the rebuilt main airframe section and motor adapter, a TeleGPS was added to the nose bay. Then, at the last minute, Meh-ga Nuke was equipped with two keychain cameras mounted looking up and down.

The rocket was about 145 pounds on the rail of Terry Lee's launch trailer, and was flowing with 2 e-matches and a pinch of Pyrodex P in the Tender Descender, and apogee charges of 6g primary and "fill the cup" secondary. The rocket departed the rail with about 5.5g max acceleration on the way to Mach 0.7 and an apogee altitude of 9183 feet. The dual deployment process worked as designed, but unfortunately the shround on the main tangled, probably due to a hasty repacking of the deployment bag during assembly on the rail. Wind pushed the airframe ENE out of the optimal landing area and into a "field of rocks", where the higher than expected landing velocity of the main airframe and fin can assembly and wind drag resulted in cosmetic damage to the fin can and more significant damage to the main airframe tube. The nose cone also suffered damage as a result of the wind causing the chutes to pull it across rocks.

Both TeleMega boards returned good data logs. The TeleGPS in the nose cone wasn't heard during launch and flight (it turns out the unsupported antenna wire broke off sometime before landing, perhaps even before launch?), but the data recovered from the board shows a clean trace of the nose cone's path during flight. Good thing we didn't need the GPS to locate and recover the nose cone!

The video from the up-looking camera worked great through apogee, but unfortunately the video froze before the main deployed so only audio was recorded for the rest of the flight. The down-looking camera video came out very well, though! It shows only a couple rotations of the airframe during ascent with some great view of the flight line, etc. It also captured the nose cone and two 5 foot surplus military parachutes deployed at apogee travelling past the main airframe rapidly at apogee. The shadow of the nose cone and associated chutes descending independently can be seen in the video before landing... and the very violent landing of the fin can and main airframe can be clearly seen.

All in all, this second flight was another huge crowd-pleaser and very satisfying overall. Particular thanks to Terry Lee for his help rebuilding the main airframe and the use of his launch trailer, George Barnes IV for his outstanding photos on launch day, and my wife Karen who attended the launch with great enthusiasm despite being only a few weeks into the recovery from major surgery.

I think the primary lesson learned from this flight is that the design of the airframe pretty much guarantees the main airframe tube is going to be damaged in each flight. The video proof of what we already understood intellectually about the dramatic reversal of direction the airframe undergoes at apogee when the nose comes off and the drogue chutes deploy alone is enough to rip the leading edge of the airframe apart back to the first centering ring below the nose shoulder. So, even without landing in rocks and being dragged due to high winds by the main chute, we probably just need to acknowledge the main airframe is in some ways a "single use" design.